False memories can arise from misattribution, suggestion, or bias, and are a normal part of everyday memory. False memories, although inaccurate, are often just as compelling as true. Problems arise when eyewitness testimony is used as the only evidence, as it can be too easily manipulated. Psychological scientist elizabeth loftus studies memories. False memory and eyewitness testimony psy363 false memory and eyewitness testimony a false memory is simply a memory that did not occur.
False memories and memory errors practical psychology. Psychologists have probed the reliability of eyewitness testimony since the beginning of the 20th century. This is part of the reason that eyewitness testimony is becoming more troublesome to hold up in court. Predicting accuracy in eyewitness testimonies with. Eyewitness identification reform innocence project.
List of books and articles about eyewitness memory. This is not to say, however, that such evidence should not be presented in a court of law. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The way in which a question is framed the use of particular wording and limiting the range of acceptable answers can direct a person to giving an answer that lacks the accuracy of one provided in response to an openended question. The experts on eyewitness memory, eyewitness identification, interrogation, false confessions, and behavioral research led by dr.
A purported eyewitness, who in fact was the actual killer, framed mr. In fact, eyewitness misidentification has played a role in more than 70 percent of wrongfully convicted individuals, according to the innocence project. Now, think back to the scenario we talked about with the robber. Because individuals with certain psychological disorders, such as antisocial. Their story has become another classic example of the fragile nature of eyewitness testimony. To test their hypothesis that the language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory thus, they aimed to show that leading questions could distort eyewitness testimony accounts and so have a confabulating effect, as the account would become distorted by cues provided in the question. An eyewitness testimony is a firsthand account of a person who viewed a specific event such as a crime. Eyewitness testimony and memory biases by cara laney and elizabeth f.
Professor of psychology, royal holloway disclosure statement. In eyewitness testimony for example, the length of time between the incident and being interviewed about the event plays a role in how suggestible people are to false memory. Adams and received immunity from prosecution in exchange for his. Psychologists are helping police and juries rethink the role of eyewitness. New research reveals how little we can trust eyewitnesses. Critical time is lost while police are distracted from the real. Why science tells us not to rely on eyewitness accounts. Why is eyewitness testimony an important area of psychological research. However, research into this area has found that eyewitness testimony can be affected by many psychological factors. As one of the leading scientists in the esoteric field of eyewitness psychology, he has spent decades trying to overturn conventional wisdom and centuries of legal precedent. Eyewitness testimony is most frequent cause of wrongful. They involve a memory that exists, but may be false.
Mistaken eyewitness identifications contributed to approximately 71% of the more than 360 wrongful convictions in the united states overturned by postconviction dna evidence. Given what we know about the vagaries of eyewitness id, this can be a difficult task. Eyewitness testimony put innocent persons on death row adams, randall dale convicted 1977, exonerated 1989 mr. Therefore both the response bias and memory change accounts have important implications for how one might regard the reliability of eyewitness testimony. It is going the way of the obsolete lie detector test. Sep 21, 2011 the answer is yes, eyewitness testimony is important, but it is dangerous to rely on as a sole source of evidence.
Eyewitness testimony is critically important to the justice system. Did mpi increase the hit rate or the false alarm rate. According to the innocence project, a legal advocacy group, about 75% of false convictions that are later overturned are based on faulty eyewitness testimony. Jun 25, 2019 eyewitness testimony can thus be critiqued on several grounds. Psychologists have also studied what legal professionals and experts know about eyewitness testimony and memory. Factors effecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Sep 26, 2012 it was a difficult case for wells, and it wont be the last. Which of the following statements about eyewitness testimony is false. Eyewitness testimony is an important area of research in cognitive psychology and human memory. This problem of incorrectly identifying a criminal is more common than people may think, which means that there are often many errors in eyewitness testimonies. Oct 27, 2016 why eyewitnesses give false evidence and how we can stop them. An eyewitness may be wrong for the reasons described above, but a witness who.
Turns out eyewitness testimony is one of the least reliable forms of evidence. In it, he explained that psychology was vital in the courtroom, how suggestion could create false memories and why eyewitness testimony was often unreliable tartakovsky, 2011. Eyewitness testimony is the best kind of evidence activities in this unit reveal how eyewitness testimony is subject to unconscious memory distortions and biases even among the. It is a legal term that essentially describes when a witness or victim is recounting their firsthand experience to another person or to a court. Apr 19, 2014 according to the innocence project eyewitness misidentification is the greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through dna testing. Beginning in the 1990s, forensic dna testing has revealed hundreds of cases of wrongful convictions. Transience simply explains the concept that memories are less accessible as time goes on. Meet psychology today s bloggers on false memories julia shaw, ph. Fortyfive american students formed an opportunity sample. Eyewitness accounts history of forensic psychology. Despite what juries tend to believe, the memories of witnesses are far from foolproof, a critical issue in the murder. It was a difficult case for wells, and it wont be the last.
Lesley stahl reports on flaws in eyewitness testimony that are at the heart of the dna exonerations of falsely convicted people. Are you sure that happened or was that that just a false. False memories and eyewitness testimonies how do they. If interviewed immediately after an event, when the details are still vivid, people are less likely to be influenced by misinformation. This was a laboratory experiment with five conditions, only one of which was experienced by each participant an independent measures design. Research regularly shows that ewt is affecting by experiences occuring after a witnessed event. Iowa state university experimental social psychologist gary wells, phd, a member of a 1999 u.
Eyewitness testimony is a situational account of a witness of what is typically a crime or an accident. Eyewitness testimony can thus be critiqued on several grounds. The testimony of eyewitness identification experts can aid jurors in understanding the psychology of mistaken identifications, but jurors ultimately have to try to decipher the accuracy of an identification on their own. According to the innocence project eyewitness misidentification is the greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through dna testing. An actual experience can become distorted as best illustrated by the cog lab experiment on false memories accessed through argosy university.
Eyewitness testimony, just like all evidence at a crime scene, can be contaminated and therefor needs to be handled very carefully. The famous false memory researcher elizabeth loftus explains. Adams was sentenced to death for the murder of a police officer in dallas county, texas. If any of those characteristics can be demonstrated, then the competency of a witness is questionable. Along the way, there were disagreements, which were typically healthy in nature. They found that subjects in a more negative mood were less likely to recall false memories implanted previously storbeck and clore, 2005.
The guilt or innocence of people being tried in courts of law often depends, upon the accuracy of the memories of eyewitnesses. List of books and articles about eyewitness memory online. An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error. The findings should be a good discussion starter for the malleability of memory and the difficulty of accurate eyewitness testimony. This includes identification of perpetrators, details of the crime scene etc. Eyewitness testimony is the account a bystander or victim gives in the courtroom, describing what that person observed that occurred during the specific incident under investigation. Department of justice panel that published the firstever national guidelines on gathering eyewitness testimony, says loftuss model suggests that crime investigators need to think about eyewitness evidence in the same way that they think about trace.
Eyewitness testimony provides a sobering counterpoint to todays theatrical reliance on eyewitness accounts in the media, and should be required reading for trial lawyers, psychologists, jurors, and anyone who considers the chilling prospect of confronting an eyewitness accusation in a court of law. Evaluating eyewitness testimonies has proven a difficult task. Eyewitness testimony reflects a decision made by a human observer based on. Normally are human reports based on visual perception believed to be very reliable if not irrefutable. Mistaken identity american psychological association. Overall, it has become clear that eyewitness testimony is not totally reliable.
Summaries of 46 cases in which mistaken or perjured. She is best known for her work in the areas of false memory and criminal psychology. Eyewitness testimony is an important area of research in cognitive psychology and. Mar 12, 2019 the study of eyewitness testimony is thriving. Why eyewitnesses give false evidence and how we can stop them. Research in eyewitness testimony is mostly considered a subfield within legal psychology, it is however a field with very broad implications. Indeed, it is necessary in all criminal trials to reconstruct facts from past events, and eyewitnesses are commonly very important to this effort.
Department of psychology, stockholm university, stockholm, sweden. Take this test and experience how false memories are made. Victim of eyewitness testimony psychology in action. The testimony of eyewitnesses whose memories may have been distorted can. For all the importance of eyewitness testimony to the. We have hundreds of real life case studies combined with scientific evidence that demonstrate the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. For details on this case and other relatively lucky individuals whose false. Findings from basic psychological research and neuroscience studies indicate that memory is a reconstructive process that is susceptible. Over the last three decades, psychologists have made important discoveries, and applied those discoveries to the legal system in myriad ways. Eyewitness testimony definition psychology glossary. Although studies in cognitive psychology have shown a positive.
Eyewitness misidentification applied social psychology asp. Here is the key to the video, postevent information, and the memory test. Eyewitnesses can provide very compelling legal testimony, but rather than recording experiences flawlessly, their memories are susceptible to a variety of errors and biases. Eyewitness testimony accuracy iresearchnet psychology. Results showed that incorrect memories included more effort cues than correct. Eyewitness testimony is most frequent cause of wrongful convictions. Inaccurate eyewitness identifications can confound investigations from the earliest stages. Eyewitness testimony and memory construction introduction to. Psychological scientists, however, have challenged many of the assumptions of the legal system and the general public regarding the. Eyewitness testimony and memory construction introduction. Sss 5of14 false memory and eyewitness testimony brian brushwood. Examining these memory distortions can help us better understand normal memory and its reconstructive nature.
Cognitive psychologist elizabeth loftus has conducted extensive research on memory. Even though memory and the process of reconstruction can be fragile, police officers, prosecutors, and the courts often rely on eyewitness identification and testimony in the prosecution of criminals. Eyewitness testimony is the best kind of evidence activities in this unit reveal how eyewitness testimony is subject to unconscious memory distortions and biases even among the most confident of witnesses. In 1984 a young woman named jennifer thompson was raped by a man who broke into her home in the middle of the night. To test their hypothesis that that language used in eyewitness testimony can differ memory. While this seems like just a fact of life, it can make a difference in eyewitness credibility. He realized that psychological research findings had the potential to inform the criminal justice system about the unrealiability of eyewitness accounts james et al. Eyewitness testimony is fickle and, all too often, shockingly inaccurate. There are hundreds of documented cases in which mistaken eyewitness identification has led to false imprisonment. It is the suggestion that is the cause of the false memory. With numerous empirical studies already establishing eyewitness testimony as an unreliable source in the legal system, no matter how metacognitively confident the witness is in their story, i really enjoyed how sauerland and her colleagues dug deeper into eyewitness testimony reliability by comparing the different testimony formats.
Jun 25, 2007 sss 5of14 false memory and eyewitness testimony brian brushwood. Eyewitness testimony psychology oxford bibliographies. This could lead to a false memory, or an overconfident testimony, which could incorrectly result in a guilty verdict. I am glad that someone brought up the john oliver piece as i think it does a good job in talking about how this can legally ruin peoples lives based on false memories. Jurors often find eyewitness testimony ewt vitally important in making their decision and yet in 75 per cent of cases where individuals have been found by dna evidence to have been wrongly convicted, the original guilty verdict was based on inaccurate. The handbook of eyewitness psychology presents a survey of research and legal opinions from international experts on the rapidly expanding scientific literature addressing the accuracy and limitations of eyewitnesses as a source of evidence for the courts. A key factor is the use of misleading information information that suggests a desired response, especially in the form of leading questions and postevent discussion. Mar 09, 2009 lesley stahl reports on flaws in eyewitness testimony that are at the heart of the dna exonerations of falsely convicted people like ronald cotton, who has now forgiven his accuser, jennifer thompson. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness point of view. The former question was also more likely to elicit a false memory of broken. Eyewitness testimony association for psychological.
Even eyewitness testimony, usually regarded as ironclad proof by juries, has become more suspect as new research demonstrates how unreliable such evidence can be. This topic is important as eyewitness testimony and false memories are used in courts as evidence so the information given by the person must be precise. A team of investigative psychologists from the university of. This essay will introduce us the definitions of false memories and eyewitness testimonies as well as what they are and also what literature has told us. Whose eyewitness testimony is probably the most reliable. I am glad that someone brought up the john oliver piece as i think it does a good job in talking about how this can legally ruin peoples lives based on false. A leading question is one which leads or persuades a person towards giving a particular response. Take this test and experience how false memories are.
792 6 1022 1294 987 197 548 1060 638 838 1343 993 1427 1077 650 941 174 648 73 1131 1377 969 1002 329 179 1398 347 519 416 713 867 345 1082 1169 883